Are there meta-analyses comparing single-crossover to double-crossover designs on how much they vary?
Not that I'm aware of, as there aren't many replicate crossover trials. Sounds like a good idea for the future though.
Are there meta-analyses comparing single-crossover to double-crossover designs on how much they vary?
Not that I'm aware of, as there aren't many replicate crossover trials. Sounds like a good idea for the future though.